Hive Talkin'

Using social media for individual advocacy

Most people know that I have a background in grassroots advocacy and that I’m passionate about social media. But what you may not realize is that I have an even deeper passion for the automotive industry. Yes, I love cars. Since 2008, I’ve been experimenting with this online medium, and I have been astonished at how quickly it has enabled me to form relationships within the car enthusiast community worldwide. In fact, thanks to the alliances I’ve formed through Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, I’m currently combining advocacy and social media to spread awareness of distracted driving.

Another auto blogger and I have created Distraction Free Fridays (#DFF). We are using our blogs and social media platforms to encourage individuals to pledge to “put their devices aside and focus on the drive” every Friday between now and June 24. So far, we’ve seen some great success on Fridays with folks using the #DFF hash tag in lieu of the typical “Follow Fridays” or #FF hash tag to denote they’re taking the pledge.

This is just one example of how individuals who have a passion for a cause can leverage their contacts – even if they’ve never met them in person before – to help spread the word. How have you used social media to advocate for a cause that you care about personally?

Learn more about Distraction Free Fridays (#DFF) on my blog, Be Car Chic. Then take the pledge for yourself by “liking” our Facebook fan page.


Tweet this

Death to BUZZ Words!

Being a recent job hunter, I found the LinkedIn Blog’s “10 Most Overused Buzzwords” entry very interesting. Obviously my occupational hunt was very successful, sacking me a position as Research Assistant (aka: intern) here at Beekeeper Group. Yet I still felt that the article pertained to me, and to my fellow resume- writers (lets face it, who ISN’T actively trying to build their resume?) because it offered statistical data and insight into the ten most played out “Buzzwords” in the biz.

Buzzwords are those hackneyed, ambiguous maxims people use to describe themselves, that really don’t tell you anything at all about a person. Not everybody in the job market can be a “results oriented” “entrepreneurial” “problem solver” with a “proven track record”. I mean, being that your resume is an extension of your brand and often your one chance to market yourself to possible employers, it becomes obvious how these phrases could be detrimental to your odds. So much for sticks and stones, right?

Instead of this conventional self-marketing approach, try to shift the focus of your resume to promoting yourself by introducing other facts. Such as:

  • Do you often complete work ahead of deadlines, or under budget?
  • Are you capable of consistently surmounting your sales targets?
  • Have you ever found new markets, introduced a pioneering process, or done something positive that had never been done before?

When trying to think of how to fit information about factual situations into a document that is traditionally expected to be no longer than two pages (including one inch margins!), think back to the last proposal you submitted. How did you phrase the data in the last presentation you gave? When was the last time you heard an exceptional pitch? Chances are, these expositions were not terribly long winded, yet still presented data and facts in an easy to digest format. Use those examples as guidelines and emulate those techniques while editing your resume (or profile, whichever) while also removing the clichéd clutter, and your hunt will likely be far more successful.


Tweet this
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Be the first to rate this post
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , ,

Uncategorized

Experts Rate Top Tools for Politics and Advocacy

Last week, at the Politics Online Conference 2010, a panel of industry experts assessed some of the top online tools and platforms in terms of their effectiveness for politics and advocacy. The panel also delivered thoughts on the future viability of these platforms by rating them either as a ”FAIL – At Risk” (meaning the platform was potentially at risk), or “<3″ – [A.K.A the heart emoticon] (meaning the platform was likely to succeed or continue to succeed). As soon as we get the video of the panel we will post the discussion segments. But, in the meantime, here is a list of some of the tools and platforms and the overall rating from the panel:

First, the panelists:

  • Sana Glickfield – Beekeeper Group
  • David All – David All Group
  • Mark Drapeau – Microsoft
  • Frank Gruber – Shiny Heart Ventures

Ratings:

  • Facebook:        4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • Twitter:            3 x ‘<3′, 1 x ‘Fail – At Risk’   [Strong But Some Risk]
  • MySpace:         4 x ‘Fail – At Risk’   [At Risk Unless in Music Scene or Districts with Low College Attendees]
  • UStream:         4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • Ning:                3 x ‘Fail – At Risk’, 1 x ‘<3′   [Losing Ground but Revamp May Rejuvenate]
  • ChatRoulette4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • Tumblr:            4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • YouTube:         4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • Del.icio.us:       3 x ‘Fail – At Risk’   [Diminishing Relevance and Utility]
  • Linkedin:          3 x ‘Fail – At Risk’, 1 x ‘<3′   [Useful Only as an Online Rolodex]
  • Location Based Services (FourSquare / Gowalla):          4 x ‘<3′   [Very Positive]
  • Email to Capitol Hill:    3 x ‘Fail – At Risk’, 1 x ‘<3′   [Less Effective But Still Valuable]
  • Farmville:         All panelists hoped it would be a ‘Fail – At Risk’ very soon!

Please feel free to add any other tools/platforms and your ratings in the comments section below.


Tweet this